Value at Risk (VaR) 95% and 99%: practical guide
Understand VaR 95% and 99%, historical vs parametric methods, and how to use VaR in portfolio decisions without common mistakes.
Thursday, 26 February 2026

What VaR 95% and 99% mean
Value at Risk estimates the loss threshold that should not be exceeded over a chosen time horizon at a given confidence level.
$VaR_c = -Q_{1-c}(R)$
Example
If daily VaR 95% is 2.1% and VaR 99% is 3.4% on a $100,000 portfolio:
- VaR 95% is about $2,100
- VaR 99% is about $3,400
Historical vs parametric VaR
- Historical VaR: uses empirical return quantiles.
- Parametric VaR: uses distribution assumptions (often normal) with mean and volatility.
Historical is often more realistic in changing markets; parametric is faster for repeated scenarios.
Key limits
VaR does not describe the average loss beyond the threshold and can underestimate fat-tail events. Combine VaR with drawdown and CVaR analysis.
Next step
- Check your current risk profile in the Wallible app
- Test allocation changes in portfolio backtesting
- Read related guides: Recovery Factor and Maximum Drawdown
Related guides
Recovery Factor: formula, interpretation, and limits
Recovery Factor shows how efficiently a portfolio recovers from drawdowns. Learn the formula, practical reading …
What is expected return and how to use it
A practical guide to understand expected return, read it inside Wallible reports, and compare it with other performance …
Calmar Ratio and Ulcer Index
How to judge risk-adjusted growth and drawdown pain with two essential risk management metrics.
