What is Value at Risk (VaR)?

Value at Risk (VaR) is a statistical measure that estimates the maximum expected loss of a portfolio over a specific time horizon at a given confidence level, typically 95% or 99%. For example, a 1-day VaR of 2% at 95% confidence means the portfolio should not lose more than 2% on any single day in 95 out of 100 days.

What is the difference between VaR 95% and VaR 99%?

VaR 95% measures the loss level exceeded only 5% of the time, while VaR 99% measures the loss exceeded only 1% of the time. VaR 99% is therefore more conservative and gives a higher loss figure, capturing more extreme scenarios. Risk managers often report both figures together.

What are the main methods for calculating VaR?

The three main methods are: Historical VaR (using actual past return distributions), Parametric VaR (assuming a normal distribution and using mean and standard deviation), and Monte Carlo VaR (simulating thousands of random scenarios). Historical VaR is intuitive and distribution-free; parametric is fast but assumes normality; Monte Carlo is the most flexible.

What is the main limitation of VaR?

VaR does not tell you how large the loss will be when it exceeds the threshold — it only tells you the threshold itself. For example, a 99% VaR of 5% means you know losses will exceed 5% on 1% of days, but not by how much. Expected Shortfall (CVaR) addresses this by measuring the average loss in the tail beyond VaR.

Value at Risk (VaR) 95% and 99%: practical guide

What VaR 95% and 99% mean

Value at Risk estimates the loss threshold that should not be exceeded over a chosen time horizon at a given confidence level.

$VaR_c = -Q_{1-c}(R)$

Example

If daily VaR 95% is 2.1% and VaR 99% is 3.4% on a $100,000 portfolio:

VaR 95% is about $2,100
VaR 99% is about $3,400

Historical vs parametric VaR

Historical VaR: uses empirical return quantiles.
Parametric VaR: uses distribution assumptions (often normal) with mean and volatility.

Historical is often more realistic in changing markets; parametric is faster for repeated scenarios.

Key limits

VaR does not describe the average loss beyond the threshold and can underestimate fat-tail events. Combine VaR with drawdown and CVaR analysis.

Next step

Check your current risk profile in the Wallible app
Test allocation changes in portfolio backtesting
Read related guides: Recovery Factor and Maximum Drawdown

Disclaimer

This article is not financial advice but an example based on studies, research and analysis conducted by our team.

Discover how quickly you can replicate this analysis in Wallible and build a weekly portfolio review habit. Start with Free and unlock Premium analytics when you need more depth.

Value at Risk (VaR) 95% and 99%: practical guide

What VaR 95% and 99% mean

Example

Historical vs parametric VaR

Key limits

Next step

Related guides

TWR vs MWRR: which return metric should you trust?

Skewness and Kurtosis: practical guide for portfolio risk

Expected Shortfall (CVaR) 95% and 99%: practical guide

Next step

Value at Risk (VaR) 95% and 99%: practical guide

What VaR 95% and 99% mean

Example

Historical vs parametric VaR

Key limits

Next step

Related guides

TWR vs MWRR: which return metric should you trust?

Skewness and Kurtosis: practical guide for portfolio risk

Expected Shortfall (CVaR) 95% and 99%: practical guide

Next step

Christmas promo week